Senator says child care funds should be restored ... but how? Perhaps by ending swag?

02/21/2013 08:15 AM

The top Senate Republican on health and welfare issues said the state should be able to find $66 million to reverse what advocates called “the worst action our state government has ever taken against low income” Kentuckians.

Sen. Julie Denton, R-Louisville, told her fellow senators Wednesday that the state’s Health and Family Services Cabinet needs to reverse cuts announced last month that would end child care stipends for low income families who earn slightly more than the federal poverty rate.

Health Cabinet Secretary Audrey Haynes has said the child care cuts were regrettable but a last resort to close a $86.6 million hole in the cabinet’s budget. Ending the subsidized child care for families earning between 100 percent and 150 percent of the federal poverty rate would be painful, Haynes said. But four state budget cuts to the agency forced officials hands, she said.

Denton, however, said the state could restore the child care subsidies if it could find $66 million, perhaps through discretionary funds, she said.

“In the big scheme of things for state government, it’s not that much money. And I feel certain we can find those dollars and do some shifting if necessary so that between April 1 and the end of the fiscal year that we can ensure that parents across the state have access to safe, clean and healthy child care,” she said prompting applause from many in the committee room.

But Gov. Steve Beshear, in a statement, said there were no such pots of money left. He said:

“The Commonwealth has sustained $1.6 billion in budget cuts over the past five years. Clearly, these difficult decisions were made after exhausting all available options, including a review of any other funds which could mitigate the impact. Rather than pointing to unidentified discretionary funds which do not exist, a constructive approach for those concerned about this is to help identify potential revenue sources. We are focused on comprehensive tax reform to help address these programs as well as the pension liability and the future of the Commonwealth, our children and their education.”

As child and family advocates outlined the effects of the cuts, at least one brought a suggestion to make up the money.

Gerry Roll, executive director of the Foundation for Appalachian Kentucky, said certain early childhood programs shouldn’t get “another dime” until the child care stipends are restored because the other programs apparently have more money than they need.

She said she attended a conference last week in which a representative from a program aimed at helping pregnant women with substance abuse problems handed out free stuff. The KIDS NOW Plus program is funded by the Kentucky Early Childhood Development Authority and Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant funds.

“The woman from KIDS NOW Plus stood up and said, ‘We had money left over, they’re sending us more money next month. We needed to spend it. So does anybody need gel pens, car chargers, cups, posty-notes? Swag,” she said as she dumped a cup of the freebies on the committee room table. Watch the video:

Other advocates, meanwhile, warned that the effects of the cuts to child care subsidies could have wide social and economic effects.

For instance, Jack Burch, executive director of the Community Action Council, told the Senate Health and Welfare Committee that affected parents will have to choose between working and taking care of their children.

He said if the average cost of child care is $500 per month, that leaves a parent with a minimum wage job with about $700 a month left to cover rent, food and transportation.

And Christen Tipton of Southside Christian Childcare in Louisville said the economic effects will spread to layoffs of daycare workers. She also said not having care puts the children at risk. Here’s how:

About Ryan Alessi

Ryan Alessi joined cn|2 in May 2010 as senior managing editor and host of Pure Politics. He has covered politics for more than 10 years, including 7 years as a reporter for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Follow Ryan on Twitter @cn2Alessi. Ryan can be reached at 502-792-1135 or ryan.alessi@twcnews.com.

Comments

  • viewer wrote on February 21, 2013 09:50 AM :

    I think the church would work here. The church could open daycares at a discount rate. It should be looked at.

  • Cat Balz wrote on February 21, 2013 02:40 PM :

    First they came for the swag, and I said nothing, for I had no swag. Then they took my gun and cigarettes and doughnuts and Big Gulp and forced me to drive a glorified golf cart to save the planet. That’s how this stuff works, folks.

  • here's my take on it wrote on February 22, 2013 09:24 AM :

    The state’s involvement in the child care payments is what has caused the prices of childcare to soar over the last decade. The have continually increased payments to centers, and then the centers turn and charge those higher rates to the rest of us. This has caused daycare to become unaffordable to a median income household.

  • viewer wrote on February 22, 2013 09:57 AM :

    Here’s my take on it – You are correct. Im affraid most wont understand what you mean by that. But you’re 100 percent correct. Very good post.

  • Willie K. wrote on February 22, 2013 04:17 PM :

    It is a no-brainer to be opposed to these cuts. However, the Republicans never have a solution to the problem, just criticism. Cut, cut, cut. But don’t cut anything that may cost me votes. Well, I’m sorry, but the endless cuts to state programs are the result of the national and state Republican party’s insistence that the rich should not pay their fair share of taxes. The poor suffer as a result of these misguided “trickle-down” policies. Denton is responsible for the cuts, until she finds the money to restore the funding. You can bet it won’t come from the pockets of her donors.

  • Adrienne Bush wrote on February 22, 2013 10:25 PM :

    Actually, the state’s child care reimbursements have been frozen to our region at least since 2007. If centers have raised rates, it’s to cover what the child care assistance program reimbursement doesn’t cover, since the reimbursement rate is less than the actual cost of providing care.

  • Amy B. wrote on February 24, 2013 08:46 AM :

    Is anyone looking at how the funds are distributed????

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.