Lawmakers prescribe do-over for Beshear officials to return with answers on health exchanges

08/15/2012 08:01 PM

State legislators expressed their frustration to health and insurance officials in Gov. Steve Beshear’s administration who could offer few answers on Wednesday about the costs and future operations of the Kentucky Health Benefit Exchange.

Officials within the Kentucky Department of Insurance and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services testified before the interim joint committee on Health and Welfare in Louisville on Wednesday about the program. But they said they couldn’t answer many of the lawmakers specific questions about the exchanges, which Gov. Steve Beshear created by executive order in mid“July”:http://mycn2.com/politics/beshear-issues-order-to-create-health-exchanges-to-be-run-out-of-health-cabinet\ . The exchange which is an offshoot of the federal Affordable Care Act will be run out of the state’s Health and Family Services Cabinet and will be overseen by an advisory panel of 11 members.

With the lack of details on the exchange the committee tabled the discussion and decided to hold an emergency meeting in early September so that officials within the cabinet can have a better idea of what the exchange could cost the commonwealth.

Rep. Addia Wuchner, R-Florence, told Carrie Banahan, who was named executive director of the exchange, that a business plan should exist by now.

Beshear’s executive order said the state-operated exchange will match up Kentuckians without health insurance with coverage — bridging the gap for uninsured Kentuckians who don’t have health coverage through their employers but earn too much money to qualify for Medicaid. It will be funded with $66.4 million in federal grants that Kentucky already received for the effort.

That nearly initial $66.4 million is meant to serve as start-up funds and pay for initial office space, computers and employees through 2014.

Starting January 2015, the exchange would have to be self sufficient or the state would be on the hook for the deficit. Bill Nold, of the Kentucky Department of Insurance, said it would be more expensive if the state left it up to the federal government to run the exchange.

The consensus from both parties was the administration needs to weigh in with more details before legislators can take any vote regarding the exchange. Democratic Sen. Dennis Parrett of Elizabethtown said he was among those who wanted to put off weighing in on the exchange.

About Nick Storm

Nick Storm joined cn|2 in December 2011 as a reporter for Pure Politics. Throughout his career, Nick has covered several big political stories up close, including interviewing President Barack Obama on the campaign trail back in 2008. Nick says he loves being at the forefront of Kentucky politics and working with the brightest journalists in the commonwealth. Follow Nick on Twitter @Nick_Storm. Nick can be reached at 502-792-1107 or nicholas.storm@twcable.com.

Comments

  • Ed Marksberry wrote on August 16, 2012 11:58 AM :

    I can understand the apprehension of the legislators; it is similar to the reaction during the civil rights acts of the 60’s. The exchange is a progressive movement and we will always have those who choose to want things to stay as they are, whether it’s right or wrong.
    To shed some light with those legislators who are showing their disdain with the Affordable Healthcare Act, one of the great things to come out of this is the Exchanges. People like me, who have been denied coverage because of a minor preexisting condition, can now purchase health insurance through the exchange. Small business owners will now not have to fret over the skyrocketing health insurance benefits they try to provide for their employee’s. Small business’s owners (those with less than 50 workers) will be able to concentrate on their business instead of the complicating and ever changing costs and coverage’s their commercial health insurance tries to provide to their employee’s.
    Now if we decide to allow the Federal Government to take over the exchange here are a few problems; we lose control over the regulatory authority of a large sum of the health insurance market, we lose control of the rating of risk selection for underwriting rules on policies sold inside and possibly outside of the exchange and finally, we lose control of health reform changes and guidelines.
    I find it ironic, that those opposed to the exchanges are usually the ones who say “keep the Federal Government out of our business.”

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.