Hemp bill's next stop: House Ag Committee; Eastern Kentuckians remain skeptical

02/15/2013 05:48 PM

The bill to regulate industrial hemp if the federal government allows it to be grown in Kentucky will now land in the lap of the Democratic House Agriculture Committee chairman who has block past hemp-related measures.

Senate Bill 50, passed the full Senate chamber on Thursday with a 31-6 vote. Five out of those six ‘no’ votes came from Eastern Kentucky senators in the congressional district held by Republican U.S. Rep. Hal Rogers, who created UNITE – an anti-drug program that covers his district.

House Speaker Greg Stumbo, D-Prestonsburg, confirmed to reporters in Frankfort that the bill, which will create a regulatory framework if the federal government allows the product to be grown, will be sent to the House Agriculture Committee.

Stumbo said panel’s chairman, Rep. Tom Mckee, D-Cynthiana, agreed with Stumbo that the bill should contain provisions calling for an economic impact study. The University of Kentucky already has been tasked by the Kentucky Industrial Hemp Commission with doing such a study, which is due this summer.

“I think he’ll have a hearing on it. I think he agrees it ought to be studied and looked at,” Stumbo said.

When asked by Pure Politics if the Eastern Kentucky delegation would be against hemp Stumbo said he couldn’t speak for all of them, but that he would be against the crop unless the economic viability could be proven and law enforcement concerns could be eased.

Watch the full interview with Stumbo on hemp here:

Senate President Robert Stivers, R-Manchester, who is also from Eastern Kentucky, chose not vote on the hemp bill Thursday. He said he had an conflict between the two sides mainly because of state and federal level concerns.

“Not having a strong opinion one way or another. I found it kind of appropriate for me to stay out of the fray,” Stivers said. Stivers is a close ally of Rogers, who opposes industrial hemp, but is married to Regina Crawford, a field representative for U.S. Sen. Mitch McConnell, who announced his support of hemp last month. .

When asked if Stivers had been in contact with Hal Rogers on the issue he said he had not talked to him about this in the last 30-days.

About Nick Storm

Nick Storm joined cn|2 in December 2011 as a reporter for Pure Politics. Throughout his career, Nick has covered several big political stories up close, including interviewing President Barack Obama on the campaign trail back in 2008. Nick says he loves being at the forefront of Kentucky politics and working with the brightest journalists in the commonwealth. Follow Nick on Twitter @Nick_Storm. Nick can be reached at 502-792-1107 or nicholas.storm@twcnews.com.



  • sam pierce wrote on February 16, 2013 12:22 PM :

    Please let this bill come to a vote in the house. Time is of the essence. If we wait until next year, other states might beat us to the punch. It does no harm to pass the industrial hemp bill this year, but it could do a lot of harm if we wait. If the economic impact study states that industrial hemp will not be of much help, what harm will we have done in passing this bill? None. However, if we wait, we could be missing the boat. Tom McKee, please listen to your constituents, instead of blindly following orders from Dictator Stumbo.

  • viewer wrote on February 16, 2013 01:15 PM :

    Hello there Sam. Glad to see you weathering well this winter. The KSP cant take this big of a cut in funding. Im for hemp too , but see that without the funding to fight the drug crisis in Ky , the hemp will not be worth the problems that will follow. I have said from the start find $3-5 million to put into fighting drugs and we will have hemp in Ky. One bright spot I do see is that Mitch wants hemp to be legal. He also can find money that wouldnt be available in normal times. So, let the study come back and let the politicians find money to replace what will be lost. Then both sides will get what they want and the state will be better off. I do like how you have stayed classy on this Sam. You’re a good spokesman for hemp. IMO

What do you have to say?


Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.