Groups try to even out Kentucky government by helping more women run for office

06/20/2012 08:28 AM

Women are woefully underrepresented in Kentucky’s government as they are in most of the other states even though women outnumber men and tend to vote more reliably.

Two groups in Kentucky are trying to change that by training women to run for office and get more involved in government and politics.

Emerge Kentucky, a program for Democratic women, will graduate its 2012 class of 25 women on Saturday at the Kentucky Democratic Party headquarters in Frankfort, said Elizabeth Sawyer, executive director of Emerge.

And the Kentucky Republican Women’s Roundtable will pick up with its new class this fall starting with remarks from a nationally-known speaker to be named later, said Gail Russell, the group’s president and a member of the first class of women to go through the program that was founded in 2002 by Cathy Bailey, the Louisville philanthropist and former U.S. Ambassador to Latvia.

Both Russell and Sawyer talked about the programs on Pure Politics on Tuesday:

Both groups boast success stories. Republican state Reps. Kim King of Harrodsburg and Donna Mayfield of Winchester participated in the GOP roundtable group, while Democratic Rep. Rita Smart of Richmond is an Emerge Kentucky graduate, while two legislative candidates in November — Kelly Whitaker of Graves County and Wanda Crupper Hammons in Grant County — are running for open state House seats.

Women are outnumbered in every top level of Kentucky government. They account for just 26 of 137 current legislators, two of seven Supreme Court justices, four of 12 cabinet secretaries and one constitutional officer — Secretary of State Alison Lundergan Grimes.

And only one out of the 16 legislative leaders is a woman: Republican Sen. Katie Stine of Southgate who serves as state Senate president pro-tem.

In the second interview segment, Sawyer and Russell talked about how women in leadership could steer Kentucky in a different direction, as well as some of the other political undertones involving gender, such as the “war on women” phrase that popped up this spring during national debates over contraception and the latest push for a federal law requiring equal pay between the genders.

For more information about the groups, you can find contact information for Gail Russell and the Kentucky Republican Women’s Roundtable here. And contact information for Elizabeth Sawyer and Emerge Kentucky on the program’s site, which Sawyer said is in the process of being revamped.

About Ryan Alessi

Ryan Alessi joined cn|2 in May 2010 as senior managing editor and host of Pure Politics. He has covered politics for more than 10 years, including 7 years as a reporter for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Follow Ryan on Twitter @cn2Alessi. Ryan can be reached at 502-792-1135 or ryan.alessi@twcable.com.

Comments

  • Bruce Layne wrote on June 20, 2012 09:31 AM :

    I had recently read a public statement from the Kentucky Republican Women’s Roundtable expressing their purpose and goals, and presumably the Democrat version is similar. I was immediately struck by how prejudicial and discriminatory it is. Read their statement of purpose expressing their goals and think about what it really means. They want more women in elected positions. It’s a zero sum game. More women equals less men. There is no escaping the fact that this is discrimination based purely on gender. Try a simple substitution and see how their mission statements sound. What if they were advocating for more men and fewer women? What if their goals were a different form of arbitrary discrimination? What if they were working to have more Muslims and fewer Jews? Or what if they advocated some form of racial discrimination?

    Can’t we put this nonsense behind us? The cure for discrimination is not reverse discrimination.

    Our goal should be BETTER candidates leading to better elected officials, irrespective of gender, race, ethnicity, religious belief, sexual orientation….

    Speaking of better representation… more like Kim King, please!

  • Cumberland Gap wrote on June 20, 2012 11:18 AM :

    Hey Bruce, not all discrimation is bad as you clearly suggest.

    For example, we choose the new car to buy with great “discrimination”.

    A tea party voter will use “discrimination” to select a candidate who believes only less government will save America from ruination. (Then they get on the airplane and silently thank God for the FAA).

    I am sure if it paid more like a regular job of this importance should and adequate staff was allowed, there would be more women or even fewer wealthy semi-retired men.

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.

Paid Advertisement