National Democrats now investing in 6th Dist. to attack Barr on "criminal record"

10/09/2012 11:52 AM

In the age of super PACs and corporate money in politics, the 6th District Congressional race between U.S. Rep. Ben Chandler, D-Versailles, and Republican Andy Barr has so far been an old school campaign.

At least at the moment, the ads in the central Kentucky district right now are being run by the candidates’ campaigns and the national party groups — the National Republican Congressional Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. It’s pretty much the same way campaigns were run four years ago before the age of Citizens United and subsequent court rulings.

The DCCC entered the 6th District ad fray on behalf of Chandler over the weekend with an ad targeting Barr, the Lexington lawyer who narrowly lost to Chandler in 2010.

The ad echoed one of the lines of attack against Barr from 2010 — referring to Barr’s “criminal record.”

The ad refers to a 1993 arrest for a fake drivers license in Florida, which was first reported in a 2010 Herald-Leader profile on Barr. Barr had pleaded guilty and was ordered to provide eight hours of community service, according to court records that the Herald-Leader’s John Cheves cited.

When Barr applied for state government jobs under Gov. Ernie Fletcher, he checked ‘No’ on the sections asking if he had ‘ever been convicted of violating any law other than ‘minor traffic violations.’ Barr, at the time, said he believed his Florida conviction was “minor” and did not merit disclosure.

In 1999 Barr was charged with Public Drinking in Lexington, the charge was dismissed several months later, but in the article it said Barr declined to explain the circumstances behind those charges.

Barr’s Campaign Manager responded saying the ad was resorting to “character assassination.”

“In a repeat of the same reprehensible tactics he used in 2010, Ben Chandler has resorted to name calling and character assassination,” Barr campaign manager Pat Melton said in a press release. “Chandler’s desperate and false personal attack is precisely why the American people are so disillusioned with politics and career politicians.”

According to Roll Call, the DCCC bought $200,000 worth of advertising in support of Chandler from Oct 6-29.

The ad buy marks the first time in this campaign the DCCC has become involved — and the latest signal that Democrats are concerned about defending the seat.

Last week, the Rothenberg Report moved the needle a tick in Barr’s direction and is now calling the race “lean Democratic.”

About Nick Storm

Nick Storm joined cn|2 in December 2011 as a reporter for Pure Politics. Throughout his career, Nick has covered several big political stories up close, including interviewing President Barack Obama on the campaign trail back in 2008. Nick says he loves being at the forefront of Kentucky politics and working with the brightest journalists in the commonwealth. Follow Nick on Twitter @Nick_Storm. Nick can be reached at 502-792-1107 or nicholas.storm@twcable.com.

Comments

  • Cat Balz wrote on October 10, 2012 11:02 AM :

    Wow, it must be true what I’m hearing about that race tightening up. Accusing your opponent of lying about a “criminal record” while leaving out the part of a college student using a fake ID might make some fair minded voters shake their heads in disgust. By the way, didn’t Barr fess up to all that criminality in his first autobiography Dreams Of My Fraternity?

  • waybert17 wrote on October 11, 2012 05:24 AM :

    …or one could read all about the Chandler family, especially Ben’s father, in “Bluegrass Conspiracy.”

  • Cumberland Gap wrote on October 11, 2012 10:05 AM :

    The trouble is the Barr campaign is heavy on the law abiding, fundamentalist, holier-than-thou rhetoric and giving the voters the truth about his actions makes Barr look really fake, even deceitful.

    Many true fundamentalists will not vote for Barr now. They can see through the deceit and will reject the unholy.

  • Lou Howe wrote on October 11, 2012 08:18 PM :

    As I see it, it is not the “youthful indiscretion,” it is the cover-up that he tried that makes him unqualified for office.

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.