Consumption based taxing structure would be "tax shift" not tax reform, KCEP says

04/24/2017 03:47 PM

Revamping the state tax code in order to generate new revenue to pay down pension debt is being discussed by the executive branch, but how the state gets there could be “very problematic” depending on the actions taken, according to one economic advocate.

Jason Bailey of the Kentucky Center for Economic Policy said a shift to a consumption based taxing model, which has been floated as a potential change to the tax code, will cut taxes for the wealthy and shift more burden to the lower and middle class.

“I wouldn’t call it tax reform — that sort of approach is more of a tax shift,” Bailey said of moving to a consumption based model.

Not only does Bailey think shifting the taxing structure towards a consumption model would be unfair, but he also said it will affect revenue in the state.

“If you have an economy with sort of rising inequality and you’re talking those people whose incomes are growing less — you’re going to have less revenue,” he said. “If the whole exercise of tax reform is to generate revenue … that’s exactly the wrong approach.”

Bailey said state’s that have shifted to a consumption based taxing model have faced budget shortfalls, credit downgrades and cuts to vital areas like education.

“That’s a really different philosophy,” he said of consumption taxing. “It’s very concerning. If that’s the framework we won’t have something that will address the real problems and move us forward.”

As a member of the 2012 Blue Ribbon Commission tax commission, Bailey said that work group attempted to “close loopholes” and end exemptions across the tax code “to make it more fair and generate more revenue.”

Hear what else Bailey has to say about tax reform, including why a grocery tax would be regressive for low income earners in the interview below.

Nick Storm

Nick Storm is the Anchor and Managing Editor of Pure Politics available exclusively on Spectrum News. Pure Politics is the only nightly program dedicated to Kentucky politics. Nick covers all of the political heavyweights and his investigative work brings to light issues that might otherwise go unnoticed, like his coverage of the backlog of DNA rape kits waiting to be tested in Kentucky. Nick is also working on a feature length bio documentary Outlaw Poet: A documentary on Ron Whitehead. Pure Politics airs weeknight at 7 and 11:30 on Spectrum News or anytime with Spectrum On Demand.Follow Nick on Twitter @NStorm_Politics. Nick can be reached at 502-792-1107 or nicholas.storm@charter.com.

4 Comments

Comments

  • Geoff Young wrote on April 25, 2017 08:27 AM :

    Jason Bailey is perhaps the best economist in Kentucky. He and State Rep. Jim Wayne have been pointing out for years that Kentucky should do exactly the opposite of what Gov. Bevin & the Republican Party of Ky. are proposing. We need to increase the income tax on the richest Kentuckians, and lower or eliminate the sales tax, which is full of loopholes. If I had been elected Governor in 2015, that type of progressive tax overhaul would’ve been my top priority. Bevin wants to increase taxes on the middle class & give the super-rich even more of a free ride than they’re getting now. He and his entire party are profoundly immoral & destructive when it comes to taxes (and several other major issues as well).

  • Raymond Hurst wrote on April 25, 2017 10:08 AM :

    IF this would take money away from public schools, then they will pass it. Lying Matt Bevin said he wold support education when he ran for office and people thought he meant that. Instead he has attacked middle class and poor families by promoting charter and private schools at the expense of public education. I guess he is supporting education, just not for us “regular” people.

  • Bill Adkins wrote on April 26, 2017 07:46 AM :

    Republicans are all about bait and switch

  • Maggie Schmidt wrote on April 27, 2017 02:05 PM :

    If Bevin confiscated ALL the income from the top 10% of Ky’s wealthiest citizens it would make only a small percentage change to annual revenues. For better or worse, Ky is a middle-class dominant state and thats where the tax money has to come from. Its simple math that the class-envy warriors refuse to discuss. The “rich” in this state just aren’t plentiful enough to make those dreams come true. And if Bevin were to try, guess what? They will move out-of-state. As any rational person would.

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.

TWEETS ABOUT KY POLITICS