Congressman Rogers says GOP freshmen must learn to govern; says No Tax pledges should expire

Kentucky Republican Congressman Hal Rogers, the House appropriations chairman, said the recent split among House Republicans over spending bills reflects how new members have been slow to embrace their role of being part of the majority.

“A lot of our Republican members don’t want to vote for any appropriations bill, particularly the freshmen and the younger members,” Rogers, 73, said at the 2:50 mark of the video.

The House last week gave final approval to spending bills for several agencies, including the departments of agriculture, justice and transportation. But more House Democrats (165) voted for the “minibus” bill than members of the House Republican majority (133). More than 100 Republicans voted against it.

Rogers, first elected to Congress in 1980, said he remembers what that was like. But he said, as appropriations chairman, his role now is to point out their responsibility as members of the House majority.

“I just say look, ‘You’re in the majority, you’re supposed to govern. You don’t have the luxury of sitting on the back benches and lobbing hand grenades to the front like you were in the minority. You are in the majority. And your responsibility to the American people is to govern and to govern wisely. And that means you have to pass these appropriations bills after you have a chance to amend them,’” Rogers said.

Rogers also answered questions about tax increases — including the Americans for Tax Reform “No Tax” pledge. Rogers, starting at the 8:00 minute mark of the interview, said those pledges should only be good for one term at a time — not for life, as the group’s leader Grover Norquist insists.

“That’s his opinion,” Rogers said.

Congress must approve spending bills for nine other areas of the federal government by Dec. 16.

Rogers said the budgets for the Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Interior pose the biggest challenges.

“It’s not about spending — the level of spending — so much as it is that a lot of our members want some riders on each of those bills that force the agency to go one particular way or the other on some policy issue,” he said just before the 5:00 minute mark.

Congress also will have to decide next year whether to extend the tax cuts Congress first approved during President George W. Bush’s administration.

“I think we could reform those loopholes and get enough tax revenue to lower the tax rates of everyone else and spur the economy. That’s what I’d like to see,” he said at the 6:00 mark.

Rogers said he would consider ending the Bush-era tax cuts to be a tax increase.

And tax increases remain a key point of contention in Washington, especially as most of the Republicans in Congress — and some Democrats — have signed the Americans for Tax Reform pledge not to raise any taxes. The head of that organization, Grover Norquist, has become a powerful figure in Washington and promises to get involved in campaigns against officials who sign the pledge but go back on it.

“I think it says that we have a policy and a position with which we agree with this man,” he said just before the 9:00 mark. “However, I think those pledges are only good for the Congress you’re elected to.”

Ryan Alessi
About Ryan Alessi

Ryan Alessi joined cn|2 in May 2010 as senior managing editor and host of Pure Politics. He has covered politics for more than 10 years, including 7 years as a reporter for the Lexington Herald-Leader. Ryan says he enjoys the challenge of interviewing political figures and civic leaders about how they want to improve Kentucky.

Comments

  • Bruce Layne wrote on November 23, 2011 11:13 AM :

    Making Hal Rogers the chairman of the Appropriations Committee is like trusting an alcoholic with the keys to your liquor cabinet. Hal Rogers has used our tax dollars to buy our votes for over thirty years. Of course Rogers wants the Republican’s No Tax pledges to expire. He loves spending tax dollars, like all RINOs. I wish the voters in Kentucky’s 5th district would wake up, so Hal Rogers’ 30 years of taxing and spending in Congress would expire. Or are the voters waiting until every bridge, road and building in Eastern Kentucky has Hal Rogers’ name on it? We’re almost there!

  • EPluribusUnum wrote on November 24, 2011 11:08 AM :

    A party that allows fealty to a private citizen in an oath has abrogated the responsibility of its members to loyalty to the citizens. Every Republican in Congress takes, when sworn to office, the oath of allegience to the US Constitution, and thereby to the people to whom the are to govern…..to allow a Grover Norquist to trump such an oath is, well, immoral, and dare I say, treason?

  • LittleGuy wrote on November 26, 2011 08:30 AM :

    Indeed, how long does Hal Rogers think it will take to corral all those pesky “freshmen” congress critters and get them to understand the program! Just tax and spend, come home to your district like you’re Santa and leave the bill (including the interest) for the grandkids! Don’t those dad-gum freshmen understand the concept of buying re-election? Good Ole Hal will show ‘em the ropes!

    It’s called “governing”. Many call it insane! Borrow more, spend more and come home a hero after bankrupting the nation. “Free money” isn’t free! There aren’t any wizzards behind the curtain and Santa isn’t really from Kentucky. Just Hal “Taxpayer Moneybags” Rogers visiting from D.C.

    On freshmen, on Bernake, on Rudolph! Ho, Ho, Ho! Ho, Ho, Ho, Ho, Ho, Ho!

  • bob wrote on November 28, 2011 10:00 AM :

    We’re taxed to death Hal. You’ve made your millions and so have your friends. Please retire to fishing with your friends in the winter in Florida! In fact, just stay in Florida! Your legacy in the 5th district is secured.

    You’ve help keep Southeast KY ignorant and in poverty for decades, congratulations!. Give an up and comer a chance there. After all, you can’t take those millions with you.

  • Freddie Taylor wrote on November 29, 2011 08:42 PM :

    On one hand you have one party going in one direction and never looking back. Then on the other hand you have the other party going in the other direction and never looking back. Then there leaves our nation and the people left standing in the middle,with no leadership! Sounds like the American way, politics as always!!!

What do you have to say?





SUBSCRIBE NOW

Subscribe to email updates.

Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.

KSTV Casting Call

MyCN2 Twitter Feed