Hal Rogers says Paul Ryan's budget 'cuts too much' but would vote for it; Addresses hemp issue
03/14/2013 06:48 PM
U.S. Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Somerset, isn’t impressed with the budget plan introduced this week by his Republican colleague, U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan.
Rogers represents Kentucky’s 5th District that’s among the poorest areas in the country. And while he said he has concerns with some of the structural changes Ryan’s budget plan makes to programs like Medicaid and Medicare and other cuts, he said he will support it. That conversation starts at 3:00 of the interview.
“I’ll be voting for it. It’s not exactly to my liking. There are a lot of things that I’m not happy with, including the overall big number,” he said. “It cuts too much spending, frankly, from the discretionary side of the budget. Most people don’t realize that we only appropriate 1/3 of federal spending … and we’ve cut that by $100 billion over the last two years.”
Rogers, last week, sponsored a measure aimed at giving the Pentagon flexibility in implementing cuts under the across-the-board cuts in the sequester. Rogers said he expects the House and Senate to reach some type of agreement to add budget flexibility for military and veterans programs.
“Those will be OK, I think. I am concerned about the impact on education and on children’s matters,” Rogers said (1:15 of the interview).
And Rogers’ name has been evoked in Frankfort during the debate over the bill to create a framework for regulating industrial hemp if the federal government makes it legal. Five of the six “no” votes in the state Senate came from legislators who live in Rogers’ Eastern Kentucky district. And Democratic House Speaker Greg Stumbo, who also opposes the measure, is from Rogers’ district too.
Watch that part of the discussion at 6:00:
Below the Fold
Senate, House committees pass companion bills dubbed "Noah's Law" on covering formula for eosinophilic disorder patients
Subscribe and get the latest political intelligence delivered to your inbox.